Biodiversity and stability of ecosystems

The role of biodiversity in benefiting stability of ecosystems is a matter of  a hot dispute.The matter of stability  of ecosystems is very important as it is a part of stability of the biosphere at the time of hazards of global change.  Not much is known on whether biodiversity is instrumental for increasing stability of AQUATIC ecosystems. A research project was done that is filling the gap in knowledge on this controversial issue.

A paper was published that provides a fresh analysis and new vision of how biodiversity helps towards better stability of aquatic habitats, i.e. water quality.  To my mind, the paper mentioned below is a contribution to better understanding of the positive role of biodiversity in increasing stability of aquatic habitats and by doing so, to increasing the stability of aquatic ecosystem as a whole. I will be happy to know the opinion of other members of the network.

Biodiversity protection and quality of water: the role of feedbacks in ecosystems.- Doklady Biological Sciences. Volume 382, Numbers 1-6, p.18-21.; ISSN0012-4966 (Print) 1608-3105 (Online). DOI 10.1023/A:1014465220673]. Springerlink and Google Sites

Tags: Ecology, ecosystems, stability, habitats, role of biodiverstity, water quality, aquatic

Share this post

Comments

  • Sergei Ostroumov, Jan 3, 2010 11:58 am

    Relevant facts that support this paper are presented in the book:
    Biological Effects of Surfactants. CRC Press. Taylor & Francis. Boca Raton, London, New York. 2006. 279 p. Bibliogr. on pages 203-243 and 250-253. Subject Index: p.255-279. ISBN 0-8493-2526-9.

  • Sami Rehman, Jan 3, 2010 6:06 pm

    Hi Sergei,

    This is most interesting. I was working in a clean water technology business back in 2009 and one of the key projects we were working on was aquaculture/fishfarming project, so I welcome this new research into biodiversity and the role it plays in the stability of aquaenvironments/ecosystems. Many thanks for this.
    Tell me Sergei, do you have some knowledge about desalination? let me know if you have any good ideas about new technologies that remove salt from sea water efficiently in a low cost, low maintenance and has a positive environmental impact. Since I believe alot of research thesedays is focusing on turning that seawater to drinking water which I think is ground breaking discovery.

  • Sergei Ostroumov, Jan 4, 2010 8:43 am

    Thank you, Sami.
    As for desalination, I agree that this issue is very important. However it is a serious challenge. I think an additional problem is that after desalination the water needs further conditioning to make it potable. The prospective method of conditioning is probably using ecotechnologies. The ecotechnologies will be discussed at the groups that I initiated: 'Water quality...' and 'Phytotechnology, phytoremediation'. Welcome to those groups.

  • Sergei Ostroumov, Jan 4, 2010 3:50 pm

    The following paper provides serious material on the important role of functioning of filter-feeders (bivalves) in conditioning habitats and environment, which is very relevant to coupling pelagial and bethal:

    -----------Vaughn C. C., Nichols S. J., Spooner D. E. Community and foodweb ecology of freshwater mussels. - Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27(2):409-423. 2008. ------------
    doi: 10.1899/07-058.1; -------------
    http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1899/07-058.1;------------


    Caryn C. Vaughn1a, S. Jerrine Nichols 2b, Daniel E. Spooner 3c

    a Oklahoma Biological Survey, Department of Zoology, and Graduate Program in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019 USA

    b US Geological Survey, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105 USA

    c Oklahoma Biological Survey and Department of Zoology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019 USA
    ---------ABSTRACT:
    Freshwater mussel (Superfamily Unionoidea) communities are important components of food webs, and they link and influence multiple trophic levels. Mussels filter food from both the water column and sediment with ciliated gills. Differences in cilia structure and arrangement might allow mussel species to partition food resources. Mussels are omnivores that feed across trophic levels on bacteria, algae, detritus, zooplankton, and perhaps, dissolved organic matter. Living mussels and their spent shells provide or improve habitat for other organisms by providing physical structure, stabilizing and bioturbating sediments, and influencing food availability directly and indirectly through biodeposition of organic matter and nutrient excretion. Effects of mussel communities on nutrient translocation and cycling depend on mussel abundance, species composition, and environmental conditions. Nutrient-related mussel effects influence multiple trophic levels. Healthy mussel communities occur as multispecies assemblages in which species interactions are probably very important. Food limitation and competition among species have been documented, but so have positive species interactions, and rare species have been shown to benefit energetically from living in species-rich communities. Effects of mussel species on ecosystem services and food webs vary across spatial and temporal scales, and the relative importance of competition and facilitation might change at different scales.

    Received: June 16, 2007; Accepted: December 28, 2007

    Keywords: Unionoidea, feeding behavior, nutrient cycling, species interactions, context-dependent effects

    Literature Cited
    Alimov, A. F. 1969. Nekotorye obscie zakonomernosti processa filtracii u dvustvorcatych molljuskov. Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii 30:621–631. PubMed
    Altieri, A. H., B. R. Silliman, and M. D. Bertness. 2007. Hierarchical organization via a facilitation cascade in intertidal cordgrass bed communities. American Naturalist 169:195–206. CrossRef, PubMed
    APHA (American Public Health Association) 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th edition American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC.
    Baker, S. M. and D. J. Hornbach. 2001. Seasonal metabolism and biochemical composition of two unionid mussels, Actinonaias ligamentina and Amblema plicata. Journal of Molluscan Studies 67:407–416.
    Bauer, G., S. Hochwald, and W. Wilkenat. 1991. Spatial distribution of freshwater mussels: the role of host fish and metabolic rate. Freshwater Biology 26:377–386. CrossRef, CSA
    Beck, K. and R. J. Neves. 2003. An evaluation of selective feeding by three age-groups of the rainbow mussel, Villosa iris. North American Journal of Aquaculture 65:203–209. CrossRef, CSA
    Beckett, D. C., B. W. Green, S. A. Thomas, and A. C. Miller. 1996. Epizoic invertebrate communities on upper Mississippi River unionid bivalves. American Midland Naturalist 135:102–114. CrossRef, CSA
    Bertness, M. D. 1989. Intraspecific competition and facilitation in a northern acorn barnacle population. Ecology 70:257–268. CrossRef, CSA
    Bertness, M. D. and R. Callaway. 1994. Positive interactions in communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:191–193. CrossRef, CSA
    Bogan, A. E. 1993. Freshwater bivalve extinctions (Mollusca: Unionoida): a search for causes. American Zoologist 33:599–609. CSA
    Brönmark, C. and B. Malmqvist. 1982. Resource partitioning between unionid mussels in a Swedish lake outlet. Holarctic Ecology 5:389–395.
    Bruno, J. F., J. J. Stachowicz, and M. D. Bertness. 2003. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:119–125. CrossRef, CSA
    Caraco, N. F., J. J. Cole, and D. L. Strayer. 2006. Top-down control from the bottom: regulation of eutrophication in a large river by benthic grazing. Limnology and Oceanography 51:664–670.
    Cardinale, B. J., M. A. Palmer, and S. L. Collins. 2002. Species diversity enhances ecosystem functioning through interspecific facilitation. Nature 415:426–429. CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
    Christian, A. D., B. N. Smith, D. J. Berg, J. C. Smoot, and R. H. Findlay. 2004. Trophic position and potential food sources of 2 species of unionid bivalves (Mollusca:Unionidae) in 2 small Ohio streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23:101–113. Bioone
    Cornell, H. V. and J. H. Lawton. 1992. Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Animal Ecology 61:1–12. CrossRef, CSA
    Crowl, T. A., W. H. McDowell, A. P. Covich, and S. L. Johnson. 2001. Freshwater shrimp effects on detrital processing and nutrients in a tropical headwater stream. Ecology 82:775–783. CSA
    Dame, R. F. 1996. Ecology of marine bivalves: an ecosystem approach CRC Press, New York.
    Davis, W. R., A. D. Christian, and D. J. Berg. 2000. Nitrogen and phosphorus cycling by freshwater mussels in a headwater stream ecosystem. Pages 141-151 in R. A. Tankersley, D. I. Warmolts, G. T. Watters, B. J. Armitage, P. D. Johnson, and R. S. Butler (editors). Freshwater Mollusk Symposium Proceedings: Part II. Musseling in on Biodiversity. Ohio Biological Survey Special Publication, Columbus, Ohio.
    DiDonato, G. T. and A. W. Stiven. 2001. Experimental studies of interactions between two unionids, Elliptio waccamawensis and Leptodea ochracea: variation in negative and positive effects. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 16:303–316. CSA
    Dietz, T. H. 1985. Ionic regulation in freshwater mussels: a brief review. American Malacological Bulletin 2:233–242.
    Francoeur, S. N., A. Pinowska, T. A. Clason, S. Makosky, and R. L. Lowe. 2002. Unionid bivalve influence on benthic algal community composition in a Michigan Lake. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 17:489–500. CSA
    Gangloff, M. M. and J. W. Feminella. 2007. Stream channel geomorphology influences mussel abundance in southern Appalachian streams, USA. Freshwater Biology 52:64–74. CrossRef
    Gao, Q. F., P. K S. Shin, G. H. Lin, S. P. Chen, and S. G. Cheung. 2006. Stable isotope and fatty acid evidence for uptake of organic waste by green-lipped mussels Perna viridis in a polyculture fish farm system. Marine Ecology Progress Series 317:273–283. CrossRef
    Gutierrez, J. L., C. G. Jones, D. L. Strayer, and O. O. Iribarne. 2003. Mollusks as ecosystem engineers: the role of shell production in aquatic habitats. Oikos 101:79–90. CrossRef, CSA
    Haag, W. R. and M. L. Warren. 1998. Role of ecological factors and reproductive strategies in structuring freshwater mussel communities. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:297–306. CrossRef, CSA
    Hardison, B. S. and J. B. Layzer. 2001. Relations between complex hydraulics and the localized distribution of mussels in three regulated rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 17:77–88. CrossRef, CSA
    Holland-Bartels, L. E. 1990. Physical factors and their influence on the mussel fauna of a main channel border habitat of the upper Mississippi River. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 9:327–335. CrossRef, CSA
    Hooper, D. U., F. S. Chapin, J. J. Ewel, A. Hector, P. Inchausti, S. Lavorel, J. H. Lawton, D. M. Lodge, M. Loreau, S. Naeem, B. Schmid, H. Setala, A. J. Symstad, J. Vandermeer, and D. A. Wardle. 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75:3–35. CrossRef
    Howard, J. K. and K. M. Cuffey. 2006. The functional role of native freshwater mussels in the fluvial benthic environment. Freshwater Biology 51:460–474. CrossRef
    Howard, J. K., K. M. Cuffey, and M. Solomon. 2005. Toward using Margaritifera falcata as an indicator of base level nitrogen and carbon isotope ratios: insights from two California Coast Range rivers. Hydrobiologia 541:229–236. CrossRef
    James, M. R. 1985. Distribution, biomass, and production of the freshwater mussel, Hyridella menziesi (Gray), in Lake Taupo, New Zealand. Freshwater Biology 15:307–314. CrossRef, CSA
    Jokela, J. 1996. Within-season reproductive and somatic energy allocation in a freshwater clam, Anodonta piscinalis. Oecologia (Berlin) 105:167–174. CSA
    Jokela, J. and P. Mutikainen. 1995. Phenotypic plasticity and priority rules for energy allocation in a freshwater clam: a field experiment. Oecologia (Berlin) 104:122–132. CrossRef, CSA
    Jonsson, M. and B. Malmqvist. 2000. Ecosystem process rate increases with animal species richness: evidence from leaf-eating, aquatic insects. Oikos 89:519–523. CrossRef
    Jonsson, M. and B. Malmqvist. 2003. Mechanisms behind positive diversity effects on ecosystem functioning: testing the facilitation and interference hypotheses. Oecologia (Berlin) 134:554–559. PubMed, CSA
    Kat, P. W. 1982. Effects of population density and substratum type on growth and migration of Elliptio complanata (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Malacological Review 15:119–127.
    Kesler, D. H., T. J. Newton, and L. Green. 2007. Long-term monitoring of growth in the Eastern Elliptio, Elliptio complanata (Bivalvia:Unionidae), in Rhode Island: a transplant experiment. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 26:123–133. Bioone
    Kryger, J. and H. U. Riisgard. 1988. Filtration rate capacities in 6 species of European freshwater bivalves. Oecologia (Berlin) 77:34–38. CrossRef, CSA
    Lewandowski, K. and A. Stanczykowska. 1975. The occurrence and role of bivalves of the family Unionidae in Mikolajskie Lake. Ekologia Polska 23:317–334.
    Matisoff, G., J. B. Fisher, and J. Matis. 1985. Effect of macroinvertebrates on the exchange of solutes between sediments and freshwater. Hydrobiologia 122:19–33. CrossRef, CSA
    McCabe, D. and N. Gotelli. 2003. Caddisfly diapause aggregations facilitate benthic invertebrate colonization. Journal of Animal Ecology 72:1015–1036. CrossRef
    McCall, P. I., M. J S. Tevesz, and S. F. Schwelgien. 1979. Sediment mixing by Lampsilis radiata siliquoidea (Mollusca) from western Lake Erie. Journal of Great Lakes Research 5:105–111. CSA
    McCall, P. L., M. J S. Tevesz, X. Wang, and J. R. Jackson. 1995. Particle mixing rates of freshwater bivalves: Anodonta grandis (Unionidae) and Sphaerium striatinium (Pisidiidae). Journal of Great Lakes Research 21:333–339. CSA
    McIvor, A. L. 2004. Freshwater mussels as biofilters PhD Dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
    Metcalfe-Smith, J. L., D. J. McGoldrick, C. R. Jacobs, J. Biberhofer, M. T. Arts, G. L. Mackie, V. S. Jackson, D. S. Schloesser, T. J. Newton, E. M. Monroe, and M. D. Drebenstedt. 2007. Creation of managed refuge sites for native freshwater mussels to mitigate impacts of the exotic zebra mussel in the delta area of Lake St. Clair. Water Science and Technology Directorate Contribution No. 07-023 Water Science and Technology Directorate, Environment Canada, Burlington, Ontario.
    Meysman, F. J R., J. J. Middleburg, and C. H R. Heip. 2006. Bioturbation: a fresh look at Darwin's last idea. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21:688–695. CrossRef, PubMed
    Morales, Y., L. J. Weber, A. E. Mynett, and T. J. Newton. 2006. Effects of substrate and hydrodynamic conditions on the formation of mussel beds in a large river. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 25:664–676. Bioone
    Naimo, T. J., E. D. Damschen, R. G. Rada, and E. M. Monroe. 1998. Nonlethal evaluation of the physiological health of unionid mussels: methods for biopsy and glycogen analysis. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 17:121–128. CrossRef, CSA
    Nalepa, T. F., W. S. Gardner, and J. M. Malczyk. 1991. Phosphorus cycling by mussels (Unionidae: Bivalvia) in Lake St. Clair. Hydrobiologia 219:239–250. CSA
    Neves, R. J., A. E. Bogan, J. D. Williams, S. A. Ahlstedt, and P. W. Hartfield. 1997. Status of aquatic mollusks in the southeastern United States: a downward spiral of diversity. Pages. 43–86. in G. W. Benz, D. E. Collins (editors). Aquatic fauna in peril: the southeastern perspective. Southeast Aquatic Research Institute, Lenz Design and Communications, Decatur, Georgia.
    Nichols, S. and D. Garling. 2000. Food-web dynamics and trophic-level interactions in a multispecies community of freshwater unionids. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78:871–882. CrossRef
    Nichols, S. J., H. Silverman, T. H. Dietz, J. W. Lynn, and D. L. Garling. 2005. Pathways of food uptake in native (Unionidae) and introduced (Corbiculidae and Dreissenidae) freshwater bivalves. Journal of Great Lakes Research 31:87–96.
    Norkko, J., S. F. Thrush, and R. M G. Wells. 2006. Indicators of short-term growth in bivalves: detecting environmental change across ecological scales. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 337:38–48. CrossRef
    Ostroumov, S. A. 2005. Some aspects of water filtering activity of filter-feeders. Hydrobiologia 542:275–286. CrossRef
    Parmalee, P. W. and A. E. Bogan. 1998. The freshwater mussels of Tennessee University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee.
    Paterson, C. G. 1983. Effect of aggregation on the respiration rate of the freshwater unionid bivalve, Elliptio complanata (Solander). Freshwater Invertebrate Biology 2:139–146. CrossRef
    Potts, W. T W. 1954. The rate of urine production of Anodonta cygnaea. Journal of Experimental Biology 31:614–617.
    Pusch, M., J. Siefert, and N. Walz. 2001. Filtration and respiration rates of two unionid species and their impact on the water quality of a lowland river. Pages. 318–326. in F. Bauer and K. Wachtler (editors). Ecology and evolution of the freshwater mussels Unionoida. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
    Raikow, D. F. and S. K. Hamilton. 2001. Bivalve diets in a Midwestern U.S. stream: a stable isotope enrichment study. Limnology and Oceanography 46:513–522.
    Roditi, H. A., N. Fisher, and S. Sanudo-Wilhelmy. 2000. Uptake of dissolved organic carbon and trace elements by zebra mussels. Nature 407:78–80. CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
    Rosenfeld, J. S. 2002. Logical fallacies in the assessment of functional redundancy. Conservation Biology 16:837–839. CrossRef, CSA
    Saarinen, M. and J. Taskinen. 2003. Burrowing and crawling behaviour of three species of unionidae in Finland. Journal of Molluscan Studies 69:81–86. CrossRef
    Sephton, T. W., C. G. Paterson, and C. H. Fernando. 1980. Spatial interrelationships of bivalves and nonbivalve benthos in a small reservoir in New Brunswick, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology 58:852–859.
    Silverman, H., S. J. Nichols, J. S. Cherry, E. Achberger, J. W. Lynn, and T. H. Dietz. 1997. Clearance of laboratory-cultured bacteria by freshwater bivalves: differences between lentic and lotic unionids. Canadian Journal of Zoology 75:1857–1866. CrossRef, CSA
    Soto, D. and G. Mena. 1999. Filter-feeding by the freshwater mussel, Diplodon chilensis, as a biocontrol of salmon farming eutrophication. Aquaculture 171:65–81. CrossRef, CSA
    Spooner, D. E. 2007. An integrative approach to understanding the structure and function of mussel communities PhD Dissertation, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma.
    Spooner, D. E. and C. C. Vaughn. 2006. Context-dependent effects of freshwater mussels on the benthic community. Freshwater Biology 51:1016–1024. corrigendum 1188. CrossRef
    Stanczykowska, A., L. Wlodzimierz, J. Mattice, and L. Krzysztof. 1976. Bivalves as a factor effecting circulation of matter in Lake Mikolajskie (Poland). Limnologica 10:347–352.
    Strayer, D. L. 1981. Notes on the microhabitats of unionid mussels in some Michigan streams. American Midland Naturalist 106:411–415. CrossRef, CSA
    Strayer, D. L. 1999a. Effects of alien species on freshwater mollusks in North America. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18:74–98. CrossRef
    Strayer, D. L. 1999b. Use of flow refuges by unionid mussels in rivers. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18:468–476. CrossRef
    Strayer, D. L., N. F. Caraco, J. J. Cole, S. Findley, and M. L. Pace. 1999. Transformation of freshwater ecosystems by bivalves. BioScience 49:19–27. CrossRef, CSA
    Strayer, D. L., J. A. Downing, W. R. Haag, T. L. King, J. B. Layzer, T. J. Newton, and S. Nichols. 2004. Changing perspectives on pearly mussels, North America's most imperiled animals. BioScience 54:429–439. Bioone
    Strayer, D. L. and J. Ralley. 1993. Microhabitat use by an assemblage of stream-dwelling unionaceans (Bivalvia), including two rare species of Alasmidonta. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12:247–258. CrossRef, CSA
    Thorp, J. H. and A. F. Casper. 2002. Potential effects on zooplankton from species shifts in planktivorous mussels: a field experiment in the St. Lawrence River. Freshwater Biology 47:101–119.
    Thorp, J. H., M. D. Delong, K. S. Greenwood, and A. F. Casper. 1998. Isotopic analysis of three food web theories in constricted and floodplain regions of a large river. Oecologia (Berlin) 117:551–563. CrossRef
    Vander Zanden, M. J. and J. B. Rasmussen. 1999. Primary consumer δ13C and δ15N and the trophic position of aquatic consumers. Ecology 80:1395–1404. CrossRef, CSA
    Vaughn, C. C. 1997. Regional patterns of mussel species distributions in North American rivers. Ecography 20:107–115. CrossRef, CSA
    Vaughn, C. C., K. B. Gido, and D. E. Spooner. 2004. Ecosystem processes performed by unionid mussels in stream mesocosms: species roles and effects of abundance. Hydrobiologia 527:35–47. CrossRef
    Vaughn, C. C. and C. C. Hakenkamp. 2001. The functional role of burrowing bivalves in freshwater ecosystems. Freshwater Biology 46:1431–1446. CrossRef, CSA
    Vaughn, C. C. and M. Pyron. 1995. Population ecology of the endangered Ouachita Rock Pocketbook mussel, Arkansia wheeleri (Bivalvia:Unionidae), in the Kiamichi River, Oklahoma. American Malacological Bulletin 11:145–151. CSA
    Vaughn, C. C. and D. E. Spooner. 2006a. Scale-dependent associations between native freshwater mussels and invasive Corbicula. Hydrobiologia 568:331–339. CrossRef
    Vaughn, C. C. and D. E. Spooner. 2006b. Unionid mussels influence macroinvertebrate assemblage structure in streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 25:691–700. Bioone
    Vaughn, C. C., D. E. Spooner, and H. S. Galbraith. 2007. Context-dependent species identity effects within a functional group of filter-feeding bivalves. Ecology 88:1664–1662.
    Vaughn, C. C., D. E. Spooner, and B. W. Hoagland. 2002. River weed growing epizoically on freshwater mussels. Southwestern Naturalist 47:604–605. CrossRef
    Vaughn, C. C. and C. M. Taylor. 1999. Impoundments and the decline of freshwater mussels: a case study of an extinction gradient. Conservation Biology 13:912–920. CrossRef
    Vaughn, C. C. and C. M. Taylor. 2000. Macroecology of a host–parasite relationship. Ecography 23:11–20. CrossRef
    Watters, G. T. 1992. Unionids, fishes, and the species–area curve. Journal of Biogeography 19:481–490. CrossRef, CSA
    Watters, G. T. 2001. The evolution of the Unionacea in North America, and its implications for the worldwide fauna. Ecological Studies 145:281–307.
    Welker, M. and N. Walz. 1998. Can mussels control the plankton in rivers? A planktological approach applying a Lagrangian sampling strategy. Limnology and Oceanography 43:753–762. CSA
    Williams, J. D., M. L. Warren, K. S. Cummings, J. L. Harris, and R. J. Neves. 1993. Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18/9:6–22. CrossRef, CSA
    Yeager, M. M., D. S. Cherry, and R. J. Neves. 1994. Feeding and burrowing behaviors of juvenile rainbow mussels, Villosa iris (Bivalvia:Unionidae). Journal of the North American Benthological Society 13:217–222. CrossRef, CSA
    Zanatta, D. T. and R. W. Murphy. 2006. Evolution of active host-attraction strategies in the freshwater mussel tribe Lampsilini (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 41:195–208. CrossRef, PubMed
    Zedler, J. B., J. C. Callaway, and G. Sullivan. 2001. Declining biodiversity: why species matter and how their functions might be restored in Californian tidal marshes. BioScience 51:1005–1017. Bioone
    Table thumbnail
    enlarge figure

    Fig. 1. Relationship between chlorophyll a and the invertebrate community on mussel shells, represented as Principal Components Analysis (PCA) axis 1 scores
    Table thumbnail
    enlarge figure

    Fig. 2. Excretion and clearance rates of mussels in the mesocosm experiment. A.—Mean (+1 SE) water-column NH3 concentration (representing excretion rate) at different mussel densities over days of the experiment. B.—Mean (+1 SE) water-column chlorophyll a concentration (representing clearance of algae from the water column) at different mussel densities over days of the experiment. C.—Regression of water-column NH3 concentration on mussel biomass (tissue dry mass) on day 3 of the mesocosm experiment. Regressions were done for mesocosms with and without Actinonaias
    Table thumbnail
    enlarge figure

    Fig. 3. Mean (+1 SE) water-column molar N:P in mesocosms with Actinonaias ligamentina or Amblema plicata at 21 and 33°C
    Table thumbnail
    enlarge figure

    Fig. 4. NH3 contributed to the water column under summer low-flow conditions by 4 species in 8 river mussel beds of different areas. NH3 excretion rates were estimated from the mesocosm experiment. Species composition and biomass data are from 8 mussel beds in the Ouachita Highlands described by Vaughn and Spooner (2006a, b)
    Table thumbnail
    enlarge figure

    Fig. 5. Water temperature and discharge in the Kiamichi River during 2003
    Table thumbnail
    enlarge figure

    Fig. 6. Predicted ecosystem services (water-column turnover and NH3 excretion) provided by 3 simulated mussel communities consisting of different proportions of Actinonaias (Act) and Amblema (Amb) in 4 different environmental contexts. Environmental contexts correspond to the numbered shaded periods in Fig. 5: I = high discharge, high water temperature, II = low discharge, high water temperature, III = low discharge, intermediate water temperature, IV = intermediate discharge, cool water temperature. Note order-of-magnitude differences in the y-axis scales among panels
    table

    Table 1. Summary of ecosystem services provided by freshwater mussel (Unionoidea) communities

    1 cvaughn@ou.edu

    2 sjnichols@usgs.gov

    3 Present address: Department of Biology, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario K9J 7B8 Canada. dspooner45@gmail.com
    Cited by

    Heather S.
    Galbraith,

    Caryn C.
    Vaughn. (2010) Temperature and food interact to influence gamete development in freshwater mussels. Hydrobiologia 636:1, 35-47
    Online publication date: 1-Jan-2010.
    CrossRef

    C.
    Faust,

    D.
    Stallknecht,

    D.
    Swayne,

    J.
    Brown. (2009) Filter-feeding bivalves can remove avian influenza viruses from water and reduce infectivity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276:1673, 3727-3735
    Online publication date: 22-Nov-2009.
    CrossRef
    Alison R. Mynsberge 2, 3 , Michael P. Strager , Jacquelyn M. Strager , Patricia M. Mazik . (2009) Developing Predictive Models for Freshwater Mussels (Mollusca: Unionidae) in the Appalachians: Limitations and Directions for Future Research. Ecoscience 16:3, 387-398
    Online publication date: 1-Sep-2009.

    Abstract & References : Full Text : PDF (283 KB) : Rights & Permissions

    Kenneth M.
    Brown,

    Wesley
    Daniel,


    Gerry
    George. (2009) The effect of Hurricane Katrina on the mussel assemblage of the Pearl River, Louisiana. Aquatic Ecology
    Online publication date: 30-Jun-2009.
    CrossRef

    H. S.
    Galbraith,

    S. E.
    Frazier,

    B.
    Allison,

    C. C.
    Vaughn. (2009) COMPARISON OF GILL SURFACE MORPHOLOGY ACROSS A GUILD OF SUSPENSION-FEEDING UNIONID BIVALVES. Journal of Molluscan Studies
    Online publication date: 2-Mar-2009.
    CrossRef
    Daniel C. Allen and Caryn C. Vaughn . (2009) Burrowing behavior of freshwater mussels in experimentally manipulated communities. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28:1, 93-100
    Online publication date: 1-Mar-2009.

    Abstract & References : Full Text : PDF (112 KB) : Rights & Permissions

    Daniel J.
    Hornbach,

    Mark C.
    Hove,

    Benjamin D.
    Dickinson,

    Kelly R.
    MacGregor,

    Jill R.
    Medland. (2009) Estimating population size and habitat associations of two federally endangered mussels in the St. Croix River, Minnesota and Wisconsin, USA. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems n/a-n/a
    Online publication date: 1-Feb-2009.
    CrossRef
    Alan D. Christian a and John L. Harris b. (2008) An introduction to directions in freshwater mollusk conservation: molecules to ecosystems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27:2, 345-348
    Online publication date: 1-Jun-2008.

    Citation : Full Text : PDF (57 KB) : Rights & Permissions
    Alan D. Christian a, Betty G. Crump b, David J. Berg c. (2008) Nutrient release and ecological stoichiometry of freshwater mussels (Mollusca:Unionidae) in 2 small, regionally distinct streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27:2, 440-450

  • Sergei Ostroumov, Jan 6, 2010 11:55 am

    May I draw your attention to a short but essential paper that is relevant to some fundamental ecological issues.

    The paper contributes to understanding key ecological mechanisms that maintain and upgrade water quality in freshwater and marine ecosystems. This paper is:

    Ostroumov S.A. Polyfunctional role of biodiversity in processes leading to water purification: current conceptualizations and concluding remarks. - Hydrobiologia, 2002 (February), 469: 203-204. DOI 10.1023/A:1015555022737;
    http://www.springerlink.com/content/hcrfvmdncdm8e3pf/

    Sustainable use of aquatic resources is based on the ability of aquatic ecosystems to maintain a certain level of water quality. Water self-purification in both freshwater and marine ecosystems is based on a number of interconnected processes (e.g., Wetzel, 1983; Spellman, 1996; Ostroumov 1998, 2000). Among them are:
    (1) physical and physico-chemical processes, including: (1.1) solution and dilution of pollutants; (1.2) export of pollutants to the adjacent land areas; (1.3) export of pollutants to the adjacent water bodies; (1.4) sorption of pollutants onto suspended particles and further sedimentation of the latter; (1.5) sorption of pollutants by sediments; (1.6) evaporation of pollutants;
    (2) chemical processes, including: (2.1) hydrolysis of pollutants; (2.2) photochemical transformations; (2.3) redox-catalytic transformations; (2.4) transformations including free radicals; (2.5) binding of pollutants by dissolved organic matter, which may lead to decreasing toxicity; (2.6) chemical oxidation of pollutants by oxygen;
    (3) biological processes, including: (3.1) sorption, uptake and accumulation of pollutants by organisms; (3.2) biotransformations (redox reactions, degradation, conjugation), mineralization of organic matter; (3.3) transformation of pollutants by extracellular enzymes; (3.4) removal of suspended matter and pollutants from the water column in the process of water filtering by filter-feeders; (3.5) removal of pollutants from the water in the process of sorption by pellets excreted by aquatic organisms; (3.6) uptake of nutrients (including P, N, and organic molecules) by organisms; (3.7) biotransformation and sorption of pollutants in soil (and removal of nutrients), important when polluted waters are in contact with terrestrial ecosystems; (3.8) a network of regulatory processes when certain organisms control or influence other organisms involved in water purification.
    Living organisms are involved in physical, physico-chemical and chemical processes 1.1-1.6 and 2.1-2.6 directly or through excretion of oxygen or organic metabolites, production of suspended matter, affecting turbidity, temperature of water or other parameters of the ecosystem. As a result, living organisms are the core component of the multitude of processes of the ecological machinery working towards improving water quality. This component performs eight vital functions directly (3.1-3.8) and is involved indirectly in some of the other twelve functions (1.1-1.6 and 2.1-2.6) so that its role is clearly polyfunctional.
    Living organisms of aquatic bodies (both autotrophs and heterotrophs) are enormously diverse in terms of taxonomy. Among them, autotrophs generate oxygen that is involved in the processes 2.6 and 2.4 above. Heterotrophs perform processes 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5 and some others. Virtually all biodiversity is involved.
    Given this polyfunctional role of aquatic organisms, in one of our publications we compared aquatic ecosystems to 'large-scale diversified bioreactors with a function of water purification' (Ostroumov, 2000).
    What is interesting about the biomachinery of water purification is the fact that it is an energy-saving device. It is using the energy of the sun (autotrophs) and the energy of organic matter which is being oxidized in the process of being removed from water by heterotrophs.
    Some interesting examples of how various organisms are incorporated in that polyfunctional activity were given by authors of the preceding papers in this volume.
    The importance of aquatic organisms in performing key functions in the hydrosphere provides an additional convincing rationale for protecting biodiversity.
    The efficiency of the entire complex of those processes leading to water purification in ecosystems is a prerequisite for the sustainable use of aquatic resources. Man-made effects on any of those processes (we have shown effects of surfactants on water filtration by bivalves; some of the experiments were carried out together with Dr. P. Donkin) may impair the efficiency of water self-purification (Ostroumov, 1998; Ostroumov et al., 1998; Ostroumov & Fedorov, 1999; Ostroumov 2001a, 2001b).
    We postulate and predict that further studies will provide new striking examples of how important biodiversity is in performing many vital ecological processes leading to upgrading water quality. By doing so, the multifunctional participation of biodiversity supports the sustainable use of water as one of key resources for mankind.
    The body of new data and ideas presented in this volume will hopefully serve towards following interconnected and partially overlapping goals:
    prioritization of efforts on research and management in the area of aquatic resources and aquatic environment;
    biodiversity studies and protection;
    sustainable use of aquatic bioresources;
    advancement of aquaculture and mariculture;
    decreasing costs and increasing efficiencies in wastewater treatment using ecosystems;
    combatting eutrophication;
    understanding the role of biota in biogeochemical flows of chemical elements and in buffering global change.
    The statements and conclusions that were made in this paper were supported in a series of other publications of the author, including the book (Biological Effects of Surfactants. CRC Press. Taylor & Francis. Boca Raton, London, New York. 2006. 279 p. ISBN 0-8493-2526-9) and a string of articles. Among them: On the biotic self-purification of aquatic ecosystems: elements of the theory. - Doklady Biological Sciences, 2004, Vol. 396, Numbers 1-6, p. 206-211. (https://www.researchgate.net/file.FileLoader.html?key=60f338228d6f3c5114d223ab81e15d3b), Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 2008, Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 147-152 (DOI 10.1134/S1995425508010177) and others.
    The paper was cited by a number of international experts, e. g. in the following papers: Hydrobiologia, 2006, 556: 365-379, DOI 10.1007/s10750-004-0189-7; Journal of Applied Phycology, 2005, 17: 557-567, DOI 10.1007/s10811-005-9006-6; Mediterranean Marine Science, 2007, Volume 8 (2), 19-32; Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 2009, Volume 12, Number 2, pp. 215-225, DOI: 10.1080/14634980902908589; Desalination, 2010, Vol. 250, Issue 1, Pages 118-129, DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2008.12.062.

    References:
    Ostroumov, S.A., 1998. Biological filtering and ecological machinery for self-purification and bioremediation in aquatic ecosystems: towards a holistic view. Rivista di Biologia / Biology Forum. 91: 247-258.
    Ostroumov, S.A., 2000. Aquatic ecosystem: a large-scale, diversified bioreactor with the function of water self-purification (Vodnaja ekosistema: krupnorazmernyj diversifitzirovannyj bioreaktor s funktzijej samoochishchenija vody). Doklady Biological Sciences 374: 514-516 (the Russian edition: Dokl. Akad. Nauk 374: 427-429). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11103331; http://sites.google.com/site/2000dbs374p514bioreactor/
    Ostroumov, S.A., 2001a. Amphiphilic chemical inhibits the ability of molluscs to filter water and to remove the cells of phytoplankton (Amfifil'noe veshchestvo podavljaet sposobnost' molluskov filtrovat' vodu i udalat' iz nee kletki fitoplanktona). Izvestia RAN. Ser. Biology. 1: 108-116. Translated into English: An amphiphilic substance inhibits the mollusk capacity to filter out phytoplankton cells from water. - Biology Bulletin, 2001, Vol. 28, No. 1, p. 95-102. DOI 10.1023/A:1026671024000. PMID: 11236572 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE].
    Ostroumov, S.A., 2001b. Effects of amphiphilic chemicals on marine organisms filter-feeders (Vozdeistvie amfifil'nykh veshchestv na morskikh gidrobiontov-filtratorov). Dokl. Akad. Nauk . Vol. 378. No. 2: 283-285. Translated into English: Effect of amphiphilic chemicals on filter-feeding marine organisms. - Doklady Biological Sciences. 2001. 378: 248-250. http://sites.google.com/site/2001dbs378p248effammaroyst/; DOI 10.1023/A:1019270825775.
    Ostroumov, S.A., P. Donkin & F. Staff, 1998. Filtration inhibition induced by two classes of synthetic surfactants in the bivalve mollusc (Narushenije filtratzii dvustvorchatymi molluskami pod vozdejstvijem poverkhnostno-aktivnykh veshchestv dvukh klassov). Dokl. Akad. Nauk 362: 574-576. Translated into English: Filtration inhibition induced by two classes of synthetic surfactants in the bivalve mollusk Mytilus edulis // Doklady Biological Sciences, 1998. Vol. 362, P. 454-456.
    Ostroumov, S.A. & V.D. Fedorov, 1999. The main components of self-purification of ecosystems and its possible impairment as a result of chemical pollution (Osnovnyje komponenty samoochishchenija ekosistem i vozmozhnost' ego narushenija v rezultate khimicheskogo zagrjaznenija). Bulletin of Moscow University. Ser. 16. Biology (Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Ser. 16. Biologija) 1: 24-32.
    Spellman, F.R., 1996. Stream Ecology and Self-purification. Technomic Publishing Co., Lancaster, Basel. 133 pp.
    Wetzel, R. G., 1983. Limnology. Saunders College Publishing, Fort Worth. 858 pp.

    ADDENDUM
    (added in 2010).
    The main conclusions of the paper were supported in a series of publications. The following publications are among them.
    1. Ostroumov S. A. Biological Effects of Surfactants. CRC Press. Taylor & Francis. Boca Raton, London, New York. 2006. 279 p. ISBN 0-8493-2526-9.
    2. Ostroumov S. A. The concept of aquatic biota as a labile and vulnerable component of the water self-purification system - Doklady Biological Sciences, Vol. 372, 2000, pp. 286–289. http://sites.google.com/site/2000dbs372p286biotalabil/;
    3. Ostroumov S. A., Kolesnikov M. P. Biocatalysis of Matter Transfer in a Microcosm Is Inhibited by a Contaminant: Effects of a Surfactant on Limnea stagnalis. - Doklady Biological Sciences, 2000, 373: 397–399. Translated from Doklady Akademii Nauk, 2000, Vol. 373, No. 2, pp. 278–280. http://sites.google.com/site/2000dbs373p397biocatallstag/
    4. Ostroumov S. A. An aquatic ecosystem: a large-scale diversified bioreactor with a water self-purification function. - Doklady Biological Sciences, 2000. Vol. 374, P. 514-516. http://sites.google.com/site/2000dbs374p514bioreactor/
    5. Ostroumov SA. Criteria of ecological hazards due to anthropogenic effects on the biota: searching for a system. - Dokl Biol Sci (Doklady Biological Sciences). 2000; 371:204-206. http://sites.google.com/site/2000dbs371p204criteria/
    6. Ostroumov S. A. An amphiphilic substance inhibits the mollusk capacity to filter out phytoplankton cells from water. - Biology Bulletin, 2001, Volume 28, Number 1, p. 95-102.
    ISSN 1062-3590 (Print) 1608-3059 (Online); DOI 10.1023/A:1026671024000; http://www.springerlink.com/content/l665628020163255/;
    7. Ostroumov S. A. Inhibitory Analysis of Regulatory Interactions in Trophic Webs. -Doklady Biological Sciences, 2001, Vol. 377, pp. 139–141. Translated from Doklady Akademii Nauk, 2000, Vol. 375, No. 6, pp. 847–849. http://sites.google.com/site/2001dbs377p139inhibitory/;
    8. Ostroumov SA. The synecological approach to the problem of eutrophication. - Dokl Biol Sci. (Doklady Biological Sciences). 2001; 381:559-562. http://scipeople.com/uploads/materials/4389/Danbio6_2001v381n5.E.eutrophication.pdf
    9. Ostroumov SA. The hazard of a two-level synergism of synecological summation of anthropogenic effects. - Dokl Biol Sci. (Doklady Biological Sciences). 2001; 380:499-501. http://sites.google.com/site/2001dbs380p499synerg/
    10. Ostroumov SA. Responses of Unio tumidus to mixed chemical preparations and the hazard of synecological summation of anthropogenic effects. - Dokl Biol Sci (Doklady Biological Sciences). 2001; 380: 492-495. http://sites.google.com/site/2001dbs380p492unio/
    11. Ostroumov SA, Kolesnikov MP. Pellets of some mollusks in the biogeochemical flows of C, N, P, Si, and Al. - Dokl Biol Sci (Doklady Biological Sciences). 2001; 379:378-381. http://sites.google.com/site/2001dbs379p378pellets/
    12. Ostroumov SA. Imbalance of factors providing control of unicellular plankton populations exposed to anthropogenic impact. - Dokl Biol Sci (Doklady Biological Sciences). 2001; 379:341-343. http://sites.google.com/site/1dbs379p341imbalance/;
    13. Ostroumov SA. Effect of amphiphilic chemicals on filter-feeding marine organisms.- Dokl Biol Sci (Doklady Biological Sciences). 2001; 378:248-250. http://sites.google.com/site/2001dbs378p248effammaroyst/
    14. Ostroumov SA. Biodiversity protection and quality of water: the role of feedbacks in ecosystems. - Dokl Biol Sci (Doklady Biological Sciences). 2002; 382:18-21; http://sites.google.com/site/2dbs382p18biodivers/; http://www.citeulike.org/pdf/user/ATP/article/6113559/ostroumov_02_biodiversity.pdf;
    15. Ostroumov SA. A new type of effect of potentially hazardous substances: uncouplers of pelagial-benthal coupling. - Dokl Biol Sci (Doklady Biological Sciences). 2002; 383:127-130. https://www.researchgate.net/file.FileLoader.html?key=d988acb599e121964c48114374a87e8d; www.springerlink.com/index/28V23JBFADL1Y100.pdf;
    16. Ostroumov S. A. Identification of a New Type of Ecological Hazard of Chemicals: Inhibition of Processes of Ecological Remediation. - Doklady Biological Sciences, Vol. 385, 2002 (November), pp. 377–379. [Translated from Doklady Akademii Nauk, Vol. 385, No. 4, 2002, pp. 571–573]. https://www.researchgate.net/file.FileLoader.html?key=8408a7cfaa984764b812ce79c77007f2;
    17. Ostroumov SA. System of principles for conservation of the biogeocenotic function and the biodiversity of filter-feeders. - Dokl Biol Sci (Doklady Biological Sciences). 2002; 383:147-150. https://www.researchgate.net/file.FileLoader.html?key=888352078b275ef40a430eb5b4d7714c;
    18. Ostroumov S. A., Walz N., Rusche R. Effect of a cationic amphiphilic compound on rotifers. - Doklady Biological Sciences. 2003 (May). Vol. 390. 252-255, [ISSN 0012-4966 (Print) 1608-3105 (Online)]. https://www.researchgate.net/file.FileLoader.html?key=def6575c794b111fcc31275e853c2b15;
    19. Ostroumov S.A. Anthropogenic effects on the biota: towards a new system of principles and criteria for analysis of ecological hazards. - Rivista di Biologia/Biology Forum. 2003. 96: 159-170. PMID: 12852181 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] http://sites.google.com/site/ostroumovsergei/publications-1/rivista2003criteria; http://scipeople.com/uploads/materials/4389/3RB96p159Anth..Criteria.doc; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12852181;
    20. Ostroumov S. A. On the biotic self-purification of aquatic ecosystems: elements of the theory. - Doklady Biological Sciences, 2004, Vol. 396, Numbers 1-6, p. 206-211. https://www.researchgate.net/file.FileLoader.html?key=60f338228d6f3c5114d223ab81e15d3b;
    21. Ostroumov S. A., Widdows J. Inhibition of mussel suspension feeding by surfactants of three classes. // Hydrobiologia. 2006. Vol. 556, No. 1. Pages: 381 – 386. DOI 10.1007/s10750-005-1200-7; http://sites.google.com/site/ostroumovsergei/publications-1/hydrobiologia2006ostwidd; http://sites.google.com/site/3surfactantsfiltrationmytilus/; http://scipeople.ru/uploads/materials/4389/_Hydrobiologia2006%20vol%20556%20No.1%20pages381-386.pdf; http://www.springerlink.com/content/7166067538534421/
    22. Ostroumov S. A. Biotic self-purification of aquatic ecosystems: from the theory to ecotechnologies. - Ecologica, 2007. vol. 15 (50), p.15-23. (ISSN 0354-3285). [http://scindeks.nb.rs/article.aspx?artid=0354-32850750015O].
    23. Ostroumov S.A., Shestakova T.V. Decreasing the measurable concentrations of Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb in the water of the experimental systems containing Ceratophyllum demersum: The phytoremediation potential // Doklady Biological Sciences 2009, Vol. 428, No. 1, p. 444-447. http://sites.google.com/site/9dbs444/; https://www.researchgate.net/file.FileLoader.html?key=8fd8998627b86102db72c9b237c25054;
    24. Ostroumov S.A. Towards the general theory of ecosystem-depended control of water quality. - Ecologica, 2009, vol. 16, No. 54, p. 25-32. http://sites.google.com/site/9enecologica16p25theory/
    25. Ostroumov S. A. Basics of the molecular-ecological mechanism of water quality formation and water self-purification.- Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 2008, Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 147-152. ISSN 1995-4255 (Print) 1995-4263 (Online); DOI 10.1134/S1995425508010177;

    Key issues relevant to the content of the paper: water quality, water purification, self-purification, biodiversity, pollutants, ecosystem services, freshwater, marine, aquatic ecosystems, sustainability, bivalves, filter-feeders, pollutants, surfactants, xenobiotics, sustainable use of aquatic resources, aquatic biota, functioning of ecosystems, hydrosphere, biosphere, environmental safety, sources of water supply, new fundamental of aquatic ecology, discovery of new basics of aquatic ecology, how to protect water quality, mechanisms of ecological stability;water purification, self-purification, biodiversity, pollutants

  • Sergei Ostroumov, Jan 6, 2010 5:49 pm

    This paper provides relevant facts and analysis:

    Basics of the molecular-ecological mechanism of water quality formation and water self-purification. - Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 2008 (Feb), Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 147-152. [ISSN 1995-4255 (Print) 1995-4263 (Online); DOI 10.1134/S1995425508010177;---
    Key words: global change, modern ecological theory, polyfunctional role, biota, water quality, self-purification, aquatic ecosystems, freshwater, marine, pollution---
    http://www.springerlink.com/content/e380263154u73045/
    https://www.researchgate.net/file.FileLoader.html?key=e533be77c87735c6dcc5cfdb9db96cec;
    http://scipeople.com/uploads/materials/4389/CPEC2008BasicsMolEcol.Mech.WaterQuali(0147.pdf;

  • Muhammad Aslam buzda..., Jan 9, 2010 11:29 am

    Dear Sergei Ostroumov
    i don't have access to this paper would you like to send it on my email
    regards
    Aslam

Add New Comment

« Back to blog overview

New to ResearchGate?

Follow updates in your field and connect with other researchers.Create Free Account »
Already a member? Log in here.

About this author

Sergei Ostroumov

M.V.Lomonosov Moscow St...

Author's blog

Followers of this author

Our authors