Philosophical Orders

Albeit the title relates to Philosophy actually it deals with Mankind Behaviorism: 'Why very few Men can easily prospect (un)known fields and really grasp (deep researching) innovative solutions derived from newer standpoints while most of them could only express astonishments - skepticisms or full engagements?"

In spite of the general philosophical hope that we all are equal while also not adhering to 1984 (George Orwell's landmark book) surely there are people that are a little bit ahead of the crowd. What is the technical foundation that entitles a person to hold such skills? If any?

After several years prospecting scientists, politicians (front and rear row), famous criminals, philosophers and other prominent people whose personal data was available while deep scrutinizing & researching it at an energized Philosophical Temple an answer was timely gathered and it did match those Men whose main skills on their fields were (badly) remarkable for mankind.

Some facts depend on their birth hour, others on life grown-up experiences and finally the surviving challenges shared with some others. Obviously a good academic background is always a must!

On the other hand in trying to compare with the front row one's a cross reference was also handled with most recent great disasters promoters in order to due balance it and taking out those whose main task was exactly to promote a disaster (no one could deny that without World War II deep suffering and scientific breakthroughs we would have not reach nowadays 6.5 billionth people and more than 70 years of life on average) a confirmation gathered by opposites results was also obtained.

There is an old motto: "You may say a person is stupid, just don't prove it".

This is a technical basic truth in case you need to hire a responsible and yet trustee person or to appoint some other one to hold a position of decision and/or command. From now on no one could say: "I didn't know!"

Cogito - Ergo Sum! A famous phrase of Rene Descartes. Always keep in mind that philosophy standpoints are clearly Philosophical Orders Temples outcomes transliterated into discussions; allegories; lineages and the like.